Examine the underlying support.
Follow findings into source documents and calculations. Identify where the file supports a conclusion and where more verification is needed.
Flightline / For advisory firms
Bring the evidence into every assessment.
Examine the basis for a finding and build a documented explanation your clients can work from.
Trace the conclusion.
Observation
Required reserves not supported
Closing funds are covered. Reserves remain short.
Supporting work
Three parts of the file, reconciled
Bank activity · Closing figures · Reserve requirement
Open question
Can the deposit be sourced?
Document the basis before changing the conclusion.
An assessment with a documented basis
Make the basis of your assessment inspectable.
An advisory conclusion needs a clear path back to the file. Use the review as an evidence base for your own analysis, with unresolved questions kept separate from established facts.
Test whether an issue is isolated.
Examine related observations across reviewed loans before drawing broader conclusions about a process or population.
Bring the supporting work with you.
Use documented findings and resolution paths to support client discussions and recommendations.
Start with your files and your standards.
A useful evaluation should reflect the decisions your team makes. Agree the file set and review criteria together, then inspect the results with the people doing the work.
Discuss your review workflow- 01
Define the assessment question and file population.
- 02
Compare the review evidence with your subject-matter experts’ conclusions.
- 03
Evaluate whether the outputs strengthen the client discussion and written record.
Judge the work for yourself.
Explore selected product examples to see how findings and supporting calculations fit together.
See the product examples ↗Your files. Your standards.
Discuss your review workflow and what a useful evaluation would look like.
Book a demo